2017年3月17日 星期五

Review: Still Alice

who:Julianne Moore
what:a professor and celebrated linguist, losing words and hence her identity to Alzheimer’s
where:not given
when:not given
why:not given
how:not given

There’s a moment in Still Alice when Julianne Moore, looking at herself in the mirror, slathers her face with cream. Piles it on, not to cleanse or beautify, but to erase. To us it still looks beautiful, but to this woman who’s a professor and celebrated linguist, losing words and hence her identity to Alzheimer’s, it’s the face of a stranger, or perhaps a face she’s no longer able to sustain. For how do we know exactly?
It’s the intent of this moving film to capture something that for obvious reasons is rarely attempted in memoir or movie, i.e., the experience of the deadly disease from the perspective of the sufferer rather than the caregivers. The eponymous title from the book by Lisa Genova that has been adapted by writer-directors Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland underlines the idea that Alice remains Alice to the end. Wanting to preserve their character’s dignity, they de-dramatize the horror, spare us the messiest and most alienating symptoms of Alzheimer’s, allowing this high-achieving woman to negotiate her own descent as far as she can.
What Alice has is early-onset Alzheimer’s, a form of the disease that is far rarer and more cataclysmic—often afflicting victims in their prime (Alice is 50)—but, ironically and for cinematic purposes, less ugly. Watching her lose a word in an early lecture before an audience of her peers, then become completely disoriented during a routine run in the park, is to stumble with her in a journey toward disintegration that is terrifyingly real.
A professor at Columbia, Alice is as passionately alert to her three grown children as to her vocation. Her scruffy-splendid faculty home in Morningside Heights is a beehive of comings and goings: she has a son (Hunter Parrish) and two grown daughters, one (Kate Bosworth) married and trying to conceive, and the other (Kristen Stewart) a struggling actress living on the West Coast and with whom Alice is having a battle of wills. Alec Baldwin plays her peripatetic scientist husband and the casting says it all: this is not the stand-by-your-demented-wife type.
For the past three decades Moore has been the high-wire artist of her generation, blithely unconcerned with safety, with protecting herself as an actress. Yet strangely, after all her roles as women in various forms of meltdown, of loneliness and despair, Alice is in some ways her most grounded character. She is more in possession of herself, there’s a density of being that forever escapes her more marginal characters.
Alice is mastering the art of losing—never have the poet’s words been more apt—but mastery here is as important as losing. An expert in different forms of nakedness, both physical and emotional, Moore must here play a woman exposed in a completely different way, inviting us to feel confusion, hope, love with her, get inside her head. It is the thing we most long to do when confronted with someone close to us whose mind and thoughts we can no longer intuit.
Alzheimer’s has emerged like cancer before it from a shameful secret to a subject of pressing, gruesome facts. Still, even more than most diseases, it’s a difficult subject for drama. Movies inhabit a world with moral coordinates, but the world of Alzheimer’s is not moral. It’s not a testing ground for character. You don’t win points for “handling it well,” there is no promise of redemption. These are words with which we console ourselves, as is the myth that Alice is still Alice.
In an interview, Moore once explained why she adored working with Robert Altman: “He loves people who are flawed, and he never resolves anything. There’s no expectation of heroism.” Moore has created a mesmerizing portrait of a woman possessed by a disease but also still possessed of a self. Perhaps we can leave the question—neurological, existential—of whether Alice is still Alice unresolved.


keywords:
linguist:語言學家

memoir:回憶錄,自傳
eponymous:同名的
alienating:不合群的
cataclysmic:激變的
afflict:折磨
ironically:諷刺地
disorient:迷惘
stumble:遲疑不決,躊躇
disintegration:崩潰
scruffy:破舊的不整齊的
peripatetic:漫遊的,流動的
blithely:無掛慮地
despair:絕望
intuit:由直覺知道
gruesome:可怕的
coordinate:同等
redemption:履行,實踐
console:安慰
mesmerizing:迷惑的
unresolved:為解決的

2017年3月16日 星期四

week2

Park Geun-hye to Be Questioned in Corruption Scandal, South Korea Says
who:former President Park Geun-hye of South Korea
what:summoned former President Park Geun-hye of South Korea for questioning in a corruption         scandal
where:South Korea
when:on Wednesday
why:corruption scandal
how:not given

SEOUL, South Korea — Prosecutors on Wednesday summoned former President Park Geun-hye of South Korea for questioning in a corruption scandal, only days after she was removed from office in a historic court ruling.

Ms. Park’s presidency formally ended last Friday, when the Constitutional Court approved the National Assembly’s vote to impeach her in December.

She was the first South Korean leader ousted under popular pressure since the country’s founding president, Syngman Rhee, fled into exile in Hawaii in 1960.

Although prosecutors have identified Ms. Park as a criminal suspect accused of bribery, extortion and abuse of power in recent months, they could not indict her or even summon her by force while she was president. But now that she has become an ordinary citizen, prosecutors moved swiftly.

On Tuesday, they said they were formally opening an investigation. On Wednesday, they told the former president to appear for questioning next Tuesday.

If she complies, she will be the first former South Korean president to be grilled by prosecutors since 2009, when former President Roh Moo-hyun was questioned on corruption allegations involving his family.

Two other former presidents — the military dictators Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo — were questioned in 1995 on suspicion of bribery. The two men, former army generals, also faced sedition and mutiny charges for their roles in the 1979 military coup that brought them to power and in the 1980 massacre of antigovernment demonstrators in the southwestern city of Kwangju.

Mr. Chun was sentenced to death — the sentence was later commuted to life in prison — while Mr. Roh was sentenced to 17 years. (Both were pardoned and released in December 1997.)

Roh Moo-hyun was never indicted; deeply humiliated, he killed himself by jumping off a cliff behind his home in southern South Korea a few weeks after he was questioned by prosecutors in Seoul. His funeral brought together a crowd of supporters who called the investigation of Mr. Roh a political vendetta from the conservative government then in power.

It has not always been easy to summon a former president.

Mr. Chun did not go to the prosecutors’ office voluntarily. When prosecutors went to apprehend him, his supporters blocked them for hours.

Such a standoff is feared if Ms. Park decides not to cooperate with prosecutors.

As president, she refused to be questioned by prosecutors or testify at the Constitutional Court, calling her impeachment politically biased. After her ouster, she hinted at defiance, refusing to accept the court ruling and instead saying that “the truth will be known” later.

Since she returned to her private home in southern Seoul on Sunday, her supporters have been rallying outside daily, waving national flags.

Ms. Park has denied any wrongdoing in the scandal, which has shaken the political and business elite for months.

Prosecutors said that she conspired with her secretive longtime confidante, Choi Soon-sil, to collect tens of millions of dollars from big businesses, like Samsung, and that some of the money represented bribes for political favors. Ms. Choi is already under arrest and on trial.


keywords:

prosecutor:檢察官
summon:召喚
National Assembly:國名大會
impeach:彈劾
bribery:賄賂
indict:控告,起訴
comply:遵從,順從
grill:盤問(口語)
allegation:申訴,辯解
sedition:煽動,叛亂
humiliate:羞辱
vendetta:仇殺,世仇
standoff:冷漠,僵持
testify:表明,聲明
defiance:藐視,反抗
conspire:密謀